Where do I stand, right now?
Accuracy is 72% and rising. Time per correct answer dropped from 3.4 min to 2.6 min. The leak is Verbal: you attempt only 67% of questions and spend too long on items you still get wrong. Fixing selection in Verbal is worth more marks this month than grinding extra Quant.
High accuracy, conservative attempts. You can add 2 easy items per mock.
Primary bottleneck. Wrong answers cost too much time. Selection is the unlock.
Good conversion once a set is chosen. Time is lost on abandoned sets.
Use your mock history to decide what deserves attention next.
Use your mock history to decide what deserves attention next.
Am I actually improving?
Compare results from the same exam and mock provider.
Compare results from the same exam and mock provider.
Compare results from the same exam and mock provider.
Compare results from the same exam and mock provider.
| Mock | Date | Diff | Time | Att | C / W | Acc | Net | Standing | Min/C | Eff | SB |
|---|
How far am I from the target?
Benchmarks appear when a relevant target and comparison band are available.
| Metric | Quant | Verbal | Logic | Healthy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attempt rate | 73% | 67% | 70% | 70–80% |
| Accuracy | 78% | 64% | 75% | ≥75% |
| Net / mock (last 4) | 34 | 22 | 28 | — |
| Min / correct | 2.4 | 3.1 | 2.5 | ≤2.6 |
| Negatives / mock | 3.5 | 5.8 | 3.5 | ≤4 |
| Diff-adjusted acc | 81% | 61% | 73% | — |
Benchmarks appear when a relevant target and comparison band are available.
Attempt more, or protect accuracy?
Timing detail helps separate speed, selection and accuracy.
Timing detail helps separate speed, selection and accuracy.
Timing detail helps separate speed, selection and accuracy.
| Mock | Section | Item | Time | Outcome | Leak | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P12 | Verbal | Passage 3 | 7.8 min | 1C 1W | Stay-too-long | Hard cap 6 min / passage |
| P12 | Logic | Set B | 8.1 min | Left | Bad selection | 90s take / leave |
| P11 | Quant | Hard TITA | 5.4 min | Wrong | Ego-solve | Leave at 3 min if no setup |
| P11 | Verbal | Short Q | 4.2 min | Wrong | Low-yield | 2 min max; last in section |
| P10 | Logic | Set C | 6.6 min | 2C 2W | Partial set | Finish a set or leave it |
Careless, or a concept gap?
Mistake types come from reviewed evidence, not from scores alone.
Mistake types come from reviewed evidence, not from scores alone.
Mistake types come from reviewed evidence, not from scores alone.
| Pattern | Section | Type | Times | Last seen | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inference treated as fact | Verbal | Concept | 5 | P12 | 2 timed inference sets / week |
| Misread “except” / “least” | Verbal | Slip | 4 | P11 | Underline qualifier before options |
| Open third Logic set | Logic | Selection | 4 | P12 | Two-set lock |
| Arithmetic sign error | Quant | Slip | 3 | P10 | 5-second sign check |
| Rushed last 4 Quant | Quant | Time | 3 | P11 | Leave 4 min buffer |
What do I do differently in the next test?
Two full mocks in 14 days is enough. The rest of the hours go to timed inference sets and Logic take-or-leave drills. More mocks without a new selection rule will reproduce the same 91–95 band.
| Full mocks | 2 |
| Verbal timed sets | 6 × 40 min |
| Logic take-or-leave | 4 × 30 min |
| Quant easy-first sprints | 3 × 25 min |
| Mistake log review | 20 min after each session |
Actions and estimates appear when there is enough supporting evidence.
| Verbal attempt rate | 67% → 75% |
| Verbal accuracy | 64% → 72% |
| Time / wrong | 2.05 → 1.6 min |
| Sunk time on skips | 9.4 → 5 min |
| Net score band | 86 → 100–108 |
Actions and estimates appear when there is enough supporting evidence.
| Move | Expected Δ | Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal: +3 high-confidence passage attempts | +7 to +9 | Med |
| Stop two blind short-Verbal guesses | +2 | Low |
| Logic: abort bad sets by 90s | +4 to +6 | Med |
| Quant: add 2 easy items | +5 to +6 | Low |
| Cap ego-solves at 3 min | +3 | Habit |